Is there a reason this page shouldn't be in a table format? Something similar to the one over at Wikipedia  would be particularly nice. It would greatly increase readability and overall aesthetics. Placatedmayhem 23:35, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I've cleaned up a lot of this page and went ahead and formatted it into tables, but there's still some stuff to go. Might have time to look at it tomorrow. Placatedmayhem 05:43, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
The Return to Ravnica icon icon is missing
- Thanks Robert SiegeAdvisor (talk) 12:57, July 31, 2013 (UTC)
Base Sets vs Expansion Sets
There are two tables on the Set article listing base sets in one table and expansion sets in another table. The issue I notice is that all of the base sets were duplicated in the expansion set table. I removed the base sets from the expansion set table just to remove the duplication for the moment.
Another alternative way to adjust the page would be to merge the two tables together to remove the duplication and just list it as MTG Sets.. then add another column to the table labeled "Expansion" and a simple Y / N or an X could note whether it's an expansion set.
I think merging the two tables together and adding a column for expansion status would be a better way to organize the page but two tables was a smaller adjustment for the moment. Anybody have any thoughts on the change or if merging both tables together would be a better method? Quinnos (talk) 19:12, July 5, 2014 (UTC)